AES vs ED: Options Risk Comparison

AES CORP and CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC compared side by side — risk score, IV Rank, edge and earnings. Updated every 30 minutes.

Metric	AES	ED
Risk Score	61	89
Risk Band	MEDIUM	HIGH
IV Rank	1.4	100.0
IV %	6.3%	54.4%
Edge Score	-60	+11
Price Δ	+0.3%	+0.1%
Next Earnings	2026-07-30	2026-08-06
Sector	Utilities	Utilities

Which has higher options risk?

CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC (ED) currently carries the higher options risk score (89 vs 61 for AES) — meaning more active catalysts that can drive an overnight move. For selling option premium, CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC (ED) has the better edge score (+11) — a stronger blend of high IV Rank and low risk.

Risk score (0–100) reflects active catalysts — earnings, legal, SEC filings and news. Edge score = IV Rank − risk score; higher is better for selling premium.

Run a full scan on each — free

Scan AES → Scan ED →

AES risk pages

AES overview AES IV / options AES earnings ED overview ED IV / options ED earnings

More Utilities comparisons

AES vs LNT AES vs AEE AES vs AEP AES vs AWK AES vs ATO AES vs CNP AES vs CMS AES vs CEG

TickerRisk provides risk scoring for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss. Full disclaimer