COP vs EQT: Options Risk Comparison

CONOCOPHILLIPS and EQT Corp compared side by side — risk score, IV Rank, edge and earnings. Updated every 30 minutes.

Metric	COP	EQT
Risk Score	70	59
Risk Band	HIGH	MEDIUM
IV Rank	50.4	42.0
IV %	33.1%	33.0%
Edge Score	-20	-17
Price Δ	-0.3%	-0.3%
Next Earnings	2026-08-06	2026-10-20
Sector	Energy	Energy

Which has higher options risk?

CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) currently carries the higher options risk score (70 vs 59 for EQT) — meaning more active catalysts that can drive an overnight move. For selling option premium, EQT Corp (EQT) has the better edge score (-17) — a stronger blend of high IV Rank and low risk.

Risk score (0–100) reflects active catalysts — earnings, legal, SEC filings and news. Edge score = IV Rank − risk score; higher is better for selling premium.

Run a full scan on each — free

Scan COP → Scan EQT →

COP risk pages

COP overview COP IV / options COP earnings EQT overview EQT IV / options EQT earnings

More Energy comparisons

COP vs APA COP vs BKR COP vs CVX COP vs DVN COP vs FANG COP vs EOG COP vs EXE COP vs XOM

TickerRisk provides risk scoring for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss. Full disclaimer