COP vs FANG: Options Risk Comparison

CONOCOPHILLIPS and Diamondback Energy, Inc. compared side by side — risk score, IV Rank, edge and earnings. Updated every 30 minutes.

Metric	COP	FANG
Risk Score	87	74
Risk Band	HIGH	HIGH
IV Rank	36.3	67.6
IV %	32.8%	39.3%
Edge Score	-51	-6
Price Δ	+0.0%	-1.1%
Next Earnings	2026-11-05	2026-11-02
Sector	Energy	Energy

Which has higher options risk?

CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) currently carries the higher options risk score (87 vs 74 for FANG) — meaning more active catalysts that can drive an overnight move. For selling option premium, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has the better edge score (-6) — a stronger blend of high IV Rank and low risk.

Risk score (0–100) reflects active catalysts — earnings, legal, SEC filings and news. Edge score = IV Rank − risk score; higher is better for selling premium.

Run a full scan on each — free

Scan COP → Scan FANG →

Full risk pages

COP risk, IV & earnings FANG risk, IV & earnings

More Energy comparisons

COP vs APA COP vs BKR COP vs CVX COP vs DVN COP vs EOG COP vs EQT COP vs EXE COP vs XOM

TickerRisk provides risk scoring for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss. Full disclaimer