FANG vs HAL: Options Risk Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. and HALLIBURTON CO compared side by side — risk score, IV Rank, edge and earnings. Updated every 30 minutes.

Metric	FANG	HAL
Risk Score	89	100
Risk Band	HIGH	HIGH
IV Rank	100.0	29.1
IV %	50.2%	37.6%
Edge Score	+11	-71
Price Δ	-0.7%	+0.0%
Next Earnings	2026-08-03	2026-10-20
Sector	Energy	Energy

Which has higher options risk?

HALLIBURTON CO (HAL) currently carries the higher options risk score (100 vs 89 for FANG) — meaning more active catalysts that can drive an overnight move. For selling option premium, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has the better edge score (+11) — a stronger blend of high IV Rank and low risk.

Risk score (0–100) reflects active catalysts — earnings, legal, SEC filings and news. Edge score = IV Rank − risk score; higher is better for selling premium.

Run a full scan on each — free

Scan FANG → Scan HAL →

FANG risk pages

FANG overview FANG IV / options FANG earnings HAL overview HAL IV / options HAL earnings

More Energy comparisons

FANG vs APA FANG vs BKR FANG vs CVX FANG vs COP FANG vs DVN FANG vs EOG FANG vs EQT FANG vs EXE

TickerRisk provides risk scoring for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss. Full disclaimer