COP vs HAL: Options Risk Comparison

CONOCOPHILLIPS and HALLIBURTON CO compared side by side — risk score, IV Rank, edge and earnings. Updated every 30 minutes.

Metric	COP	HAL
Risk Score	85	40
Risk Band	HIGH	LOW
IV Rank	36.3	35.9
IV %	32.8%	39.7%
Edge Score	-49	-4
Price Δ	+0.1%	+0.3%
Next Earnings	2026-11-05	2027-01-20
Sector	Energy	Energy

Which has higher options risk?

CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) currently carries the higher options risk score (85 vs 40 for HAL) — meaning more active catalysts that can drive an overnight move. For selling option premium, HALLIBURTON CO (HAL) has the better edge score (-4) — a stronger blend of high IV Rank and low risk.

Risk score (0–100) reflects active catalysts — earnings, legal, SEC filings and news. Edge score = IV Rank − risk score; higher is better for selling premium.

Run a full scan on each — free

Scan COP → Scan HAL →

Full risk pages

COP risk, IV & earnings HAL risk, IV & earnings

More Energy comparisons

COP vs APA COP vs BKR COP vs CVX COP vs DVN COP vs FANG COP vs EOG COP vs EQT COP vs EXE

TickerRisk provides risk scoring for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Options trading involves substantial risk of loss. Full disclaimer